Description

This con case argues that U.S. regime change should be judged by outcomes, not intentions. Built around Absher, Grier, and Grier’s blowback framework, the case shows that U.S.-sponsored regime change made target countries less democratic, poorer, and no more stable. It directly turns pro claims about promoting freedom by proving intervention can crush democracy instead of saving it. This is a strong, evidence-driven con case for teams that want a clear, practical argument focused on probability, responsibility, and real-world consequences.